Indian ‘socialism’ 😵‍💫 from the 1970s is alive & well… 🤦🏻‍♂️

Hey Citizens of the World,
To experience India in the 1970s, you can now move to New York! 😉

These are some of New York’s next mayor’s plans:

– Free bus rides.
Zohran brother – Delhi, Karnataka, etc will soon be suing you for plagiarism.

– Freeze the rent on 20 lakh houses (many of which were/are already subsidised).
Looks like Zo copy-pasted from the Indian Rent Control Act 1948.

– NY’s social housing development agency will build more than 2lakh new homes.
Clearly uncle has been closely studying the ‘sterling success’ of DDA, MHADA, BDA, etc. of India and wants to replicate it there.

– Set up & run government grocery stores with low prices.
Indian Ration Shops & Kendriya Bhandars are celebrating that someone is copying them.

Most of these ideas are the some of the biggest failures of hard-socialist India of the 1960s, 1970s & early 1980s, which we in India are, thankfully, seeing in our rearview mirror as we drive away (too slowly for my liking) from that regressive toxic-socialist nonsense, into the real new world of progressive modern socio-economic politics.

That these idiotic ideas have appeal in New York – the global brand ambassador of capitalism – feels to me like it’s from a dystopian Netflix show set in an post-apocalypse world.

Maybe Zo should simply ask the thousands of Indians, who are currently living in & around New York (many of who are among the brightest, most ambitious, entrepreneurial people from India) why they moved there. And he would have gotten an answer why NOT to do this lunacy.

That said, if you ask them now, you may not get an immediate response, as most of them will be busy searching for a new city to move to. 😆

Hope some of them move back to Mumbai. Lower taxes than NY, some excellent new road & metro infrastructure, near-zero guns in the hands of people on the road, zero fentenyl-pumped druggies on our roads and our taxes aren’t going towards paying for illegal immigrants to stay in hotels.

Also, we have the world’s best pav-bhaji and vada pav – the two things from 1980s India that New York should have adopted, instead of this nonsense toxic-socialism… 🤷🏻‍♂️

End of Rant. 😏

————————————


Hinduism & movies…

Over the past few years, as I have been watching movies and paying more & more attention to their core messages, an interesting thought has emerged where I have started to see core concepts of Sanatan Dharma (referred commonly as Hinduism) linked to many movies…

Here I try to speak about 5 of them…

Interstellar

What is the idea that propels the plot? That there is a universal super-consciousness that transcends time and space, and in which all human life is connected – and it has been around for thousands of years.

It is Vedic.

When the film’s astronaut hero (Matthew McConaughey), declares that the mysterious and all-knowing “they”, who created a wormhole near Saturn through which he travels to save mankind – dissolving his sense of material reality in the process, are in fact “us”, he is simply repeating the central notion of the Upanishads, India’s oldest philosophical texts. These hold that individual human minds are merely brief reflections within a cosmic one – “Aham Brahmasmi”.

Matrix – Look at the Matrix movies – the core plotpoint is that this world is an illusion. It’s about maya – that if we can cut through the illusions and connect with something larger we can do all sorts of seemingly ‘superhuman’ things in this world of maya. Neo achieves abilities that many yogis have in the past. As described by Paramahansa Yogananda – “they can defy the laws of observed reality”, also aligned with the concept of people achieving ‘siddhis’ in Hinduism.

Star Wars – It was the film, with its cosmic scale and theme of a universal and undying “Force” that exists in & around all things and enables living beings to align themselves with it.

This eternalisation is the closest definition of the concept of ‘sanatani’ that one can think of – eternal, undying and all-pervasive.

By the way – there is also a term for this force in Bharatiya language – it’s called ‘chaitanya’. Every living thing has ‘chaitanya’ in them.

IMO Star Wars opened up the world to Indian esotericism more than anything else, albeit wrapped in a shroud of fantasy. George Lucas has written multiple times that he was influenced by the mythologist Joseph Campbell & his work – A Hero With a Thousand Faces and traced the narrative arc common to all mythic heroes that Luke Skywalker would embark upon.

Campbell himself has written and said multiple times that his ‘hero’ in the book he wrote lived by his Upanishadic mantra “follow your bliss”, which he explains as having derived from the Sanskrit term sat-chit-ananda.

The word sat means being,” said Campbell. “Chit means consciousness. Ananda means bliss or rapture. I thought, ‘I don’t know whether my consciousness is proper consciousness or not. I don’t know whether what I know of my being is my proper being or not, but I do know where my rapture is. So let me hang on to rapture, and that will bring me both my consciousness and my being’.” His mantra was the paradigm for Skywalker’s own realisation of the force, the sense of peace, purpose and power gained once he allowed himself to accept and unify with it. “If you follow your bliss,” wrote Campbell, “you put yourself on a kind of track that has been there all the while, waiting for you, and the life that you ought to be living is the one you are living.”

As his mastery of the force neared its peak, Skywalker comes perilously close to taking Vader’s sinister path. With this, Star Wars delves deeply into Natyashastra and the rasa theory which has no concept of ‘villainy’ but just two type of bravery – the positive bravery (Veer ras) and negative bravery (Raudra ras), with the former being followers of dharma and the latter those who don’t follow dharma (and hence follow adharma). This establishes the principle of (super)heroes having to overcome an inner darkness while battling an external enemy, and finding an enlightenment in the process.

Inception – Christopher Nolan’s Inception reinterprets Indian philosophical concepts through a cinematic lens, particularly the notion of time dilation within nested dream levels. The movie postulates that as one delves deeper into these dream levels, the perception of time stretches exponentially, distancing the mind from reality. This idea resonates strongly with Hindu temporal units, presenting an intriguing analogy. The narrative suggests that our perceived life is merely a dream, a product of our divine self’s slumber. Consequently, we forget our true origins and mistake this dream-like existence for reality, leading to recurring cycles of suffering. Thus, Inception’s labyrinth of dreams and its manipulation of time remarkably parallels key elements of Hindu philosophy, infusing the film with profound metaphysical insights.

The Avatar series: The title itself, “Avatar,” is derived from the Sanskrit word for incarnation. The film draws parallels with Sanatani concepts of nature worship & divine incarnations.


2025 was an eventful & a momentous year for me… 😊😇

The year both started & ended with the Ganga 🌊 – January saw us at the Kumbh Mela 🕉️🔥 and December saw us at Varanasi. 🔱

We visited the Ayodhya Ram Mandir & Sarnath. 🛕🚩☸️🪷

Yash turned 21. Pooja turned 50. My mother turned 75.

I was invited to join the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and be on a the Oscars jury.

I went to Moscow & hung out at the Kremlin.

Was deeply involved in organising the largest conference ever in India for the Media & Entertainment industry.

And had a whole load of experiences – too many to count.

All-in-all, 2025 has been an awesome year…
Looking forward to a even more eventful & momentous 2026!!! 😀😁

Photos… 👇🏻


Thoughts to live by in 2026… & beyond… My ‘enlightenment’ over the past year(s). 😇😊😇

At the risk of sounding pompous & self-important, I thought I’d list out some realities of life which I have been presented to and which I have accumulated as a collective of

‘Thoughts to Live By‘

Status Quo is a comfortable place where nothing grows.

Being ‘reasonable’ is the surest, shortest & easiest path to mediocrity.

Never try to impress those who don’t respect your opinion.

Being fine with being insulted is the surest way of losing your character.

When you stop letting people disrespect you, they start calling you ‘difficult’.

You are not obligated to be associated with people who make your life worse.

We all have two lives. The real one starts when we realise we only have one.

Money can’t buy you happiness, but I’d rather cry in a Ferrari than in an autorickshaw.

If you’re not happy while having nothing, you’ll never be happy even if you have everything.

Happiness is not a destination, but a state of mind. आनंद गंतव्यस्थान नाही, मनाची अवस्था आहे. खुशी मंज़िल नहीं, मनोदशा है.

Your feelings aren’t facts.

————————————————————-

I dumped the above lines alongwith my photo into Gemini and this is the image it created to represent me!!! 😂👌🏻😂

AI ki jai ho!!! 🤩🙌🏻


December 21, 1891 – the birth of basketball! 🏀⛹🏻

In 1891, 31-year-old Canadian graduate student James Naismith needed to solve a problem in Springfield, MA, where he worked as a gym teacher at a YMCA (now Springfield College). His students, forced indoors because of winter, had become rowdy and needed a way to stay in shape. They had a lot of energy, but no way to burn it off. It was too cold to play football and baseball, and too dangerous to play those sports in the gym.

The school asked Naismith to think of a new indoor sport. Naismith remembered a rock-tossing game he played as a child. How about a game where players threw a ball at a target? The team that tossed the most balls into the target would win.

Naismith called his new game “basketball”.

A photo of Dr. James Naismith, the inventor of basketball, practicing with his wife in 1928.

Two peach baskets and a soccer ball were the equipment. Naismith put the baskets at each end of the gym, nailed 10 feet above the floor. The teams each had nine players. Naismith threw the ball in the air for the first tipoff. On December 21, 1891, the game of basketball was born in Springfield, Massachusetts.

However, since there were no rules, the game became very rough with a lot of ‘tackling’ between the players. So, finally Naismith wrote up 13 rules, the first of which is that players could not run with the ball.

The new sport quickly grew in popularity. Naismith’s students went on to become teachers and coaches, spreading the game. Teams sprung up at high schools and colleges. Boys and girls across the nation began playing basketball.

Basketball became an Olympic sport in 1936. For the first Olympic basketball game, Naismith tossed the ball for the tipoff.

The game James Naismith invented as a winter “distraction” had turned into a global sport.

A 1939 radio interview with Dr Naismith – the inventor of Basketball

For his new game Naismith selected features of football (soccer), American football, field hockey, and other outdoor sports but (in theory) eliminated body contact between players.

Because his physical education class at that time was composed of 18 men, basketball originally was played by 9 on each side (eventually reduced to 5).

The first games employed half-bushel peach baskets as targets, so a stepladder was needed to retrieve the ball after infrequent goals. Naismith’s original rules, prohibiting walking or running with the ball and limiting physical contact, are still the basis of a game that spread throughout the world.

In 1898 Naismith received an M.D. from Gross Medical College, Denver, Colorado, afterward the University of Colorado School of Medicine. From that year until 1937 he was chairman of the physical education department at the University of Kansas, Lawrence, where he also coached basketball until 1908. In addition to basketball, he is credited with inventing the protective helmet for football players. The Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame, Springfield, Massachusetts, was incorporated in 1959.


About Dr. James Naismith

James Naismith, (born November 6, 1861, Almonte, Ontario, Canada, dies November 28, 1939, Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.), was a Canadian-American physical-education director who, in December 1891, at the International Young Men’s Christian Association Training School, afterward Springfield (Massachusetts) College, invented the game of basketball.

————————————

What is the job of Cinema? To entertain or to make society better?

Cinema’s primary job – or of ALL fiction content is to entertain. And while entertaining, if they end up educating the audience, giving a message or making society better, that is a bonus.

People should stop reading too much into cinematic content. What you see on screen is NOT a manual on how people are supposed to function. It is simply a fictional story.

Let’s look at some examples:

In cinema, mostly in the genre-category popularly described as a ‘rom-com’ or a ‘rom-dramedy’ (basically a comedy or drama with a romance angle to it), a man wooing/courting/pursuing a woman has, for decades, involved what one may refer to today as ‘appropriating her physical space’ (even often times, physically accosting her), till she helplessly fell in love with him. Public harassment of the woman was bonafide entertainment with hundreds of films having at least one song where the girl was chased (today it would be called stalked) by the boy in college corridors & city streets (Tezaab, Dil, Phool Aur Kaante, Ishq, Khiladi and many many more).

Amitabh Bachchan, possibly India’s best actors and a huge icon, has on screen:
– turned a normal day into a wet-t-shirt day for Kimi Katkar in Hum.
– slut-shamed Zeenat Aman in Dostana.
– cornered Zeenat Aman in Lawaaris and pretended he was going to molest her “to teach her a lesson”.
In all of the above cases, the lady fell head over heels in love with Bachchan’s character.

Further:
– The molestation threat was also repeated by Aamir Khan in Dil with Madhuri Dixit ‘to teach her a lesson’, only to have her fall in love with him too.
– Govinda’s stalking of Karishma Kapoor in Raja Babu was a big hit.
– Shah Rukh Khan’s manic obsession in Darr turned him into a phenomenon.
– Most characters in Vishal Bhardwaj’s Omkara use multiple anti-women expletives.
– Tere Naam of course turned the obsessed lover-turned-kidnapper, into an object of sympathy for his one-sided passion.
– The double-meaning songs with women in participation, in Mard, Vidhaata and many more mainstream films, were celebrated mainstream music.

And it is not just the 80s & 90s, even the ‘classics’, which have been enjoyed by both ‘the intellectuals’ and ‘the masses’, are ‘guilty’ of this stuff:
– Raj Kapoor slapped and manhandled Nargis in Awara (1956) because she playfully called him ‘Junglee’.
– In An Evening in Paris (1967), Shammi Kapoor dangled from a helicopter in a revealing bathrobe to ‘attract’ his love interest. He also ran around behind her singing “Akele Akele kahaan ja rahe ho”. In real life today, these things would be considered criminal offenses of ‘indecent exposure’ and ‘stalking’.
– In Gulzar’s Ijaazat (hugely modern & progressive by all standards back then) an ex-wife touches the feet of her husband in the last scene, even though it is the husband who morally failed their marriage.
– There was also the upright ‘good-boy’ leading man of Basu Chatterjee’s Swami (1970s) who repeatedly reminds his impetuous wife Saudamini that she must behave because she is a “Vaishnav ki patni” and that her place is with nobody else except,……….you guessed it……., her ‘master’, her husband, her ‘Swami’.

Now, clearly such behaviour is not meant to be repeated in the real world. But these themes existed back then because they were representative of prevalent ills in society. Women had less agency back then. Caste-structure was more rigid, etc. In today’s world, these ills have almost been eliminated and hence such behaviour on screen almost does not exist. And even when it does, is almost always portrayed in a negative light.

A movie like Kabir Singh, while being enjoyed by many (KS made nearly 300Cr), also had its share of detractors who were ‘outraged’ by the misogyny and patriarchy of the lead character. Not me. I actually liked the way the director of Kabir Singh spoke of the “Kabir-slapping-Preeti” scene which evoked a lot of reactions among people. He spoke about how he saw it as a natural action/reaction of 2 people who were passionately into each other but were having serious problems with each other as well and were completely frustrated and at their wits end with each other. Also, that it is a fictional story, and it was NOT supposed to be an instructional video for how boys should behave with girls. And the director was right.

To look at another example – let’s look at Dev D, by Anurag Kashyap. AK’s Dev D is a man who is vindictive, petty and weak. He wants the world rearranged as per his convenience. He is involved in a drunken driving episode where someone dies. Now, this is completely contradictory to the original character he is playing on screen – Sarat Chandra’s Devdas. Chandra’s Devdas knows he is a moral failure and that he has failed as a lover and a human-being so he drinks himself to death. Dev D on the other hand lives in a haze of utter impunity in which he continues to have a love-interest who tenderly bathes him in a tub while his ex-girlfriend (now married to someone else) shows up one day to his messy room and………..ends up washing his clothes. I found this to be complete nonsense. But I still liked the movie a lot………..so did a lot of people. So much so that Dev D is celebrated as a modern-day masterpiece by men & women alike, despite all the character flaws of the lead character. Of course, the excellent music, great direction by AK and lovely performances by everyone made liking the movie easier, but in essence, the movie worked because it released to a changing Indian society that was ready to give people second chances.

So what is the point of me writing and you reading, all this?

Often-times cinema needs you to suspend your disbelief to enjoy a film as a fictional story. It is this suspension of disbelief that allows you to enjoy a fictional ‘reality’ where a man flies through the air backwards and lands 10 feet away when being punched by Inspector Singham. Or that a retired old jailer can shoot an exact map of India around a villain using a machine gun. Or that 3 men can donate blood at the same time, with their blood going into a common bottle and the same bottle is being used to transfuse blood into a woman, all in real time. Or that a dog, inspired by God no less, can save an improper marriage from happening.

Just like there is suspension of disbelief in cinema, there should also be ‘suspension of political-correctness’. Yes, there are people who want everything in the world to be politically correct, sexuality-agnostic, gender-respectful, culturally appropriate, etc etc. However, if they look for the same thing in the fictional world of movies, then they are just setting themselves up to be disappointed.

As much as anyone may think they are or should be, movies are entertainment and are not agents of societal change. So, looking for a moral-science class in movies is as appropriate as looking for snow in Mumbai. Movies depict events & incidents as they are in that fictional world the creators have created, not as they should ideally be in real life.

If society changes, so will entertainment content. Movies / cinema is a soft-target which can be easily ‘blamed’ for society’s ills. And when we do that, we take away any real chance of change. Grown adults molesting women because they are ‘influenced’ by cinema, no matter how glamorous the ‘hero’ is, is complete nonsense and a canard that has been played out for too long in our society. The people who claim this are absolving themselves of all personal responsibility. And those who amplify this thought are just as horrible because you are making Cinema out to be what it is not. We should basically be watching movies for what they are, and stop looking at them as instructional videos on how the world should function.

Unless we accept that both cinema & society are influenced by the two real agents of change – our family system and our education system – two institutions which are supposed to instil values & learning in our lives, we will always continue to have this argument on whether cinema influences society or does society influences cinema.

To sum all this up – Yes, both Cinema and Society influence each other and will continue to do so. But the two real agents of positive change in our world are – our family & our education system.

P.S.
All that said, I do have one hope. For the longest time, our police forces have been portrayed in a negative light in our content (especially in the 20th century). Over the past 20 years or so, we have started to see them portrayed in a much more positive light – both men & women. Movies like Singham, Sooryavanshi, Mardaani, Delhi Crime, et al are showing them as heroes & agents of positive change and I hope that it ends up causing the average Indian to look at our police forces with a more positive outlook, coz they deserve it…

Film critics… 🙄🤷🏻‍♂️

“The greatest trick film critics have pulled is to convince the world that they are relevant“

Long before I became a part of the Filmed Entertainment industry 20 years ago, I have always been heavily skeptical of film critics / reviewers. Most of this skepticism stemmed from the fact that my experience watching films over the past 40+ years, has almost never aligned with the views of the critics. I am what you would call – the ideal film watcher. I like all kinds of films. Even if one aspect of a film is good, I like it. I am able to ignore the bad parts and focus on the good ones.

Over the past 20 years, my skepticism has transmogrified* into empirical evidence. There are tens (if not hundreds) of films I have tracked over the years that have got 1/2, 1, 1&1/2, 2 stars from critics (a disgusting way to rate a movie, but whatever…), which have gone on to make millions and millions of Rs at the Box Office and have been seen by hundreds of thousands of people. Clearly people do not care what the critics have to say, or they lay more faith on the first-hand feedback from their friend / neighbour / work colleague / classmate on a movie, than on a ‘critic’.

Further, critics have done themselves no favours by ‘selling’ their reviews. There are dozens of stories – some first hand, some second-hand – all of which talk about the ‘paid reviews’ mafia run by film critics. Arrange a special ‘press screening’, feed them lots of food & booze and pay them Rs XX lakhs for a 4-star review. If you don’t, they will pan the film.

These stories have penetrated deep into society. I interact with close to 5000 students and parents each year – most of them M&E industry aspirants. Have been doing so for the past 18-19 years. I have seen the steady & secular decline in the credibility of film reviews among ‘the public’, so much so that most of them don’t know / don’t care who has written / said what about which film. They make their watching decision on a whole other set of criteria and reviews don’t even feature in their top 10 decision making criteria.

In the end, all I want to do is quote from one of my favourite movies – Ratatouille…

“In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face, is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is probably more meaningful than our criticism designating it so.”
– Anton Ego, Critic.

————————————————————

*Calvin & Hobbes fans will get this…

Remembering some less widely known heroes of Mumbai 26/11 attacks…

The November 26th terrorist attacks in Mumbai by Pakistani terrorists were ghastly. While many many individuals showcased extraordinary courage, here’s remembering some less widely known heroes of the Mumbai 26/11 attacks:

  1. Mukesh Jadhav: A 23 year old Home Guard earning mere Rs 90 per day. He was posted at CST. When Kasab & gang came he guided many passengers to safety. In saving one passenger he came face to face with one terrorist & lost his life.
  2. Jillu Yadav – He was a constable of RPF & he took Kasab & Ismail Khan head on. He was armed with outdated .303 rifle & terrorists had 3 AK47 & grenades. He fought bravely & even threw chairs when his rifle jammed to not allow terrorist to cross over to other platform.
  3. Vishnu Zende – He is possibly known to some & unknown to others. He was announcer at CST when carnage started. He was fired upon but he kept announcing & informed passenger about terrorist presence. Due to his announcements many lives were saved.
  4. Vijay Surve – He is a Shivsainik & when 26/11 started he along with few of his Shiv Sena workers shifted people around Nariman House to safer locations. He later received a letter from NSG also & they commended his for his work.
  5. Captain Tamil Selvan – He was parcel contractor & suddenly when injured people came at his counter he realised that there was attack at CST. He & his two staff members evacuated many & saved lives of 36 injured. He is sitting BJP MLA from Sion.
  6. Vijay Khandekar – He was wireless operator & he was on leave when event occurred. He immediately proceeded to Cama Hospital & he was martyred when grenade was thrown at police party.
  7. Inspector Sanjay Govilkar – He was part of the police team that captured Ajmal Kasab alive. When he realised on scene that Kasab has attacked Omble he used his lathi to disarm Kasab. For his heroic act he received President’s Medal for gallantry.
  8. Sub-Inspector Bhaskar Kadam – He was the one to intercept Skoda of terrorist & he neutralised Ismail Khan with six shots fired from his gun. He received Rs 75,000 prize & President’s Medal for Gallantry.
  9. Inspector Deepak Dhole – He managed to keep the terrorists at Taj Hotel confined to top floor for four hours & he responded whenever they tried to flee to other location. He suffered burn injuries. He never got any reward or promotion despite promise from then HM RR Patil.
  10. Inspector Nagappa Mahale – He was the one who coordinated the operation at Chowpatty which led to arrest of Kasab yet he never received any commendation or reward. His station was understaffed yet he managed this operation.
  11. Inspector Kishor Shinde – When a bag full of RDX was found at Oberoi Trident he quickly took it & placed it at an isolated place. It exploded few minutes later. If not for him many lives would have been lost that day.
  12. Captain Amitendra Singh – This 25 year old braveheart from NSG suffered serious injuries to his eyes during raid at Oberoi Hotel. He lost his left eye permanently & returned to duty on a desk job. He was awarded with Shaurya Chakra.
  13. Sub-Inspector Sudam Pandarkar – He was in ladies compartment for duty when he heard gunshots. He fired 3 shots from his .303 rifle & in return fire from terrorists he was wounded in the chest. He luckily survived & urged Govt to give them better guns.
  14. Commando Sunil Yadav – NSG brave-heart was trying to rescue people stuck at Taj Hotel when a bullet passed through his both legs. Somehow he got up & rescued guest who were stuck at 4th floor.
  15. Dr Ashish Tiwari – He was physician at Bombay hospital. He drove to hospital as soon as he got report of attacks. He & his team set up various operation units at war footing. They saved many lives with their quick response. To get a better idea, watch Mumbai Diaries.

There are many more unsung commoners who helped people during this tragedy. Homage to all brave-hearts whether it was police personnel, hotel staff, nurses or common civilians like you & me who went out of their way to save people they never met in their life. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

———————————————

And finally, Tukaram Omble. 🙏🏻

It is worth noting that Kasab, like other terrorists, was ordered by his Pakistani handlers to wear a Kalava, the sacred Hindu thread worn by many (including me) & was not meant to be captured alive. That he ultimately was, by Tukaram Omble, ruined the plans of Pakistan, and many others in India, of proclaiming 26/11 as a Hindu conspiracy.

One man! Just one man foiled the intended outcome of the entire plan, if not the plan itself much to the frustration of the Pakistanis, many Indian politicians including many Congressis and some people from the film industry.

November/18th Rezang La and PVC Major Shaitan Singh!

2 days ago was 18th November. On 18 November 1962 occurred the battle of Rezang La, where 123 Indian soldiers 3, Kumaon under Major Shaitan Singh faced impossible odds against 3000 well-armed Chinese and fought to the last man under the harshest of conditions

This is a story of unimaginable sacrifice. This is a story of men pitted against impossible odds. This is the story of Indian soldiers who looked death in the eye and did not flinch. This is the story of the Battle of Rezang La.

The annals of the Indian Army are replete with stories of bravery and uncommon valor. And then there are stories of courage so overwhelming that it is almost impossible for the human soul to even comprehend that such men walked the face of this very earth.

On a freezing and unforgiving November night, 120 Indian soldiers – frostbitten, weary, hungry and heavily outnumbered – defied the might of the rampaging Chinese Army and Major Shaitan Singh and men of Charlie Company, 13 Kumaon Regiment, forever passed into the mists of legend.

This is a story of unimaginable sacrifice. This is a story of men pitted against impossible odds. This is the story of Indian soldiers who looked death in the eye and did not flinch.

This is the story of the Battle of Rezang La.

Ladakh, 1962

In their initial assault on Indian positions in October, the Chinese had overrun border posts from Daulat Beg Oldie to Damchok, along the Karakoram Range. The defence of Chushul was the responsibility of 114 Brigade, which had a battalion less. An Infantry Brigade has 3 battalions. 114 Brigade had just 1/8 Gurkha Rifles and 5 Jat Regiment. When the danger to Chushul was realized, 13 Kumaon was rushed from Baramulla to augment 114 Brigade.

Other companies of 13 Kumaon occupied heights like Gun Hill, Gurung Hill and Mugger Hill. Charlie Company was given Rezang La, a pass 19 km away on the southeastern approach to Chushul. Rezang La was all rock, bitterly cold with bone chilling winds and the troops were not acclimatized to such extreme temperatures. The company was deployed at a height of 16,404 feet above sea level, and the main company position was defended by the 7th, 8th& 9th platoons. The surrounding mountains isolated it from the rest of the battalion.

No suitable winter clothing, underarmed and unprotected

The biting cold and the howling winds were accompanied by snowfall. Lack of protective winter clothing made the vigil more treacherous. And to add to the already impossible situation, Charlie Company was “crested to artillery”. This meant that there was an intervening feature, which did not allow Charlie Company the cover and protection of Indian Army’s artillery.

Charlie Company was without cover, without support and on its own.

In the very early hours of 18 November, the Chinese Army attacked the 7th and 8th platoon.

At 0500 hrs, Charlie Company opened up with rifles, machine guns and mortars. The retaliation was so ferocious that hundreds of Chinese lay dead. The first wave of the Chinese Army was repulsed.

At 0540 hrs, Charlie Company came under intense artillery and mortar shelling, and under the cover of this fire, about 350 Chinese attacked 9th platoon. The platoon, true to their training, held their fire till the last moment. When the Chinese were a mere 90 meters away, the 9th platoon opened up with all their weapons. Their fire was devastating and hundreds of Chinese dead bodies littered the “nullahs”. The second wave of the Chinese Army was repulsed.

Impossible Odds

Major Shaitan Singh moved from platoon to platoon, firing at the enemy and encouraging his men. He ignored the grave danger to his life and kept fighting. They say that he fought like a man possessed, completely oblivious to his own safety.

For the Chinese, this horrific rate of casualties was not sustainable. They changed tactics. 9th platoon was brought under withering MMG fire and under the cover of this fire, 400 Chinese attacked 8th platoon from the rear. This attack was stopped at the platoon barbed wire fence. Simultaneously, a heavily armed assault group of 120 Chinese attacked 7th platoon from the rear. The 7th platoon responded with mortars and rifle fire. There were heavy casualties on both the sides.

By now, the strength of 7th and 8th platoon was severely depleted.

When the Chinese again assaulted the 7th platoon, our soldiers rushed out of their post and engaged the Chinese in hand-to-hand combat. The Chinese brought reinforcements.

Out of ammunitions, they fought with their bare hands

The entire 7th and 8th platoon of Charlie Company was martyred. There were no survivors. 9th platoon was very severely depleted and out of ammunition. So, the survivors fought the heavily armed Chinese with their bare hands. Naik Ram Singh, a wrestler, killed many Chinese soldiers with his bare hands before he was shot in the head.

Major Shaitan Singh was constantly fighting, moving from platoon to platoon, encouraging his men and leading from the front. During the course of the battle, he was critically injured by MMG fire. While being evacuated, the Chinese started firing at him and the two soldiers who were accompanying him. Not wanting his soldiers to be killed in such a manner, he ordered them to leave him with his weapon and rejoin the fighting.

They repulsed seven attacks by the Chinese

Charlie Company, 13 Kumaon, repulsed seven attacks by the Chinese before the entire company was martyred in combat.

On 21 November 1962, a unilateral ceasefire was declared between China and India.

When the Indian Army visited the Charlie Company location after the war, Major Shaitan Singh was found holding his weapon. He had died fighting. The nursing assistant was found dead with bandages and a syringe in his hand. The mortar section commander was found dead, holding a mortar round. He kept firing till his position was overrun and he was killed. Out of the thousand mortar rounds that Charlie Company had, all but 7 had been fired.

Out of the 120+ soldiers of Charlie Company, 114 were martyred and 6 were captured by the Chinese Army and kept as PoWs. They later miraculously escaped.

Param Veer Chakra

For conspicuous bravery and heroism beyond the call of duty, Major Shaitan Singh Bhati was posthumously awarded a grateful nation’s highest gallantry award, the Param Veer Chakra. The company was also awarded 8 Veer Chakras and 4 Sena Medals for exceptional bravery. Charlie Company was later re-designated as “Rezang La Company”.

I don’t know if Rezang La was strategically important or not, but in those dark days of the winter of 1962, for an army facing reverse after reverse, Rezang La somehow became a matter of national honor. This was where the Indian Army dug in and said “thus far, and no further”. Rezang La was not just about “izzat”. Somewhere along the way, it became “zidd”.

Naam, Namak, Nishan

122 Ahirs from Haryana, led by Major Shaitan Singh Bhati of Jodhpur, fought for “Naam, Namak, Nishan” at -30 degrees centigrade. In freezing, inhuman cold, clothed in thin sweaters and jackets, wet canvas shoes, badly equipped and armed with Second World War vintage .303 rifles, they fought against an enemy who was far better equipped and armed.

When they were out of ammunition, they fought with their bayonets. When their bayonets broke, they fought with their bare hands. These young men from Haryana had probably never seen mountains so high. Most saw snow for the first time. But it is also true that the mountains of Ladakh had never seen such grit.

These brave 120+ fought against 3000 attacking Chinese and counted over 1300 enemy dead before embracing martyrdom.

Today, a memorial stands at Rezang La, honoring the memory of those heroes. It reads:
“How can a man die better
Than facing fearful odds
For the ashes of his fathers
And the temples of his Gods.”
To the sacred memory of the Heroes of Rezang La, 114 Martyrs of 13 Kumaon who fought to the Last Man, Last Round, Against Hordes of Chinese on 18 November 1962.
– Built by All Ranks 13th Battalion, The Kumaon Regiment.

P.S. This is not entirely written by me – compiled from a few sources.


Did you know that Pakistan’s first law minister was a dalit?

This is Jogendra Nath Mandal, Pakistan’s first Law Minister & one of the leading founding persons of Pakistan. A Dalit.


Jogendra Nath Mandal was an eminent dalit lawyer in the 1930s & 40s in India.

His political journey started as an independent candidate during the 1937 provincial assembly elections where he won from  the Bakharganj North East Rural constituency in the Bengal legislative assembly.

He had often argued that Dalits would be better off with Muslims than with upper caste Hindus. He joined the Muslim League and supported the creation of Pakistan. He was possibly the most prominent non-Muslim in the Muslim League.

Mandal vehemently opposed the partition of Bengal in 1947. His rationale being that all of Bengal should come to Pakistan since a divided Bengal would subject the Dalits of West Bengal to the dominance of the upper caste Hindus there.

He Was  Pakistan’s First Law Minister in 1948, but In 1950 he ended up leaving Pakistan & coming back to India due to both himself being at the receiving end of hate & discrimination because he was Hindu, as well as the persecution and takeover of properties of Hindus in general & Dalits in particular who had stayed back in Pakistan, and the Pakistani state’s unwillingness to act against it.

He was also targeted by the largely Muslim bureaucracy and ended up with an arrest warrant being issued against him.

He tendered his resignation to the then PM Liaquat Ali Khan with an utter sense of frustration, and expatriated to India, as a refugee.

He came back to India, lived for nearly 2 decades as a refugee, was not active in politics and spent time in social service secluded & in deep regret of his decision.

————————————————–